Prediction of Christian Sigsgaard [550th] vs Cem Ilkel [578th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W W L W W L
Form
W W W W W W L W L WH2H: Sigsgaard 1 - 1 Ilkel
They have played 5 sets in total, with Sigsgaard winning 3 and Ilkel winning 2. The last match between Sigsgaard and Ilkel was at the M15 Doha, 17-12-2024, First, Hard with Christian Sigsgaard getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Christian Sigsgaard | 1 |
| Cem Ilkel | 1 |
| Sigsgaard | Stats | Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| 73% (8-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 81% (25-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 550 | Ranking | 578 |
| 545 | Highest Rank | 144 |
| 28 | Age | 29 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 2 | Titles | 7 |
| 64% (112-63) | Career Total W/L | 57% (433-332) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $225,530 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 6-7(2) 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 27 | Games Won | 23 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:39:30 | Average Match Time | 0:39:30 |
| 60% (32/53) | 1st Serve % | 50% (22/44) |
| 78% (25/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (12/22) |
| 57% (12/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (10/22) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (22/44) | Return Points Win % | 30% (16/53) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Christian Sigsgaard vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sigsgaard 1 - 1 Ilkel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sigsgaard has won 42.35% of points on their second serve, while Ilkel has won 45.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sigsgaard, in recent form, has won 45.07% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 40.56%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.02% and 25.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sigsgaard has saved 52.98% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sigsgaard has won 69.7% of matches played (W/L 23/ 10), with Ilkel winning 58.93% (W/L 33/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sigsgaard has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 27/ 14), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 283/ 176), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Sigsgaard has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 72.41% of matches (W/L 21/ 8), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.05% of matches (W/L 27/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Sigsgaard winning 1 times and Ilkel being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Sigsgaard winning 3 and Ilkel winning 2. The last match between Sigsgaard and Ilkel was at the M15 Doha, 17-12-2024, First, Hard with Christian Sigsgaard getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:39:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sigsgaard and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sigsgaard winning 0 times and Ilkel 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Sigsgaard winning 1, and Ilkel 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sigsgaard has played against opponents with an average rank of 159.03 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 185.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sigsgaard has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sigsgaard has converted 28.75% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 37.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Christian Sigsgaard vs Cem Ilkel Best Odds For The Match
Christian Sigsgaard Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Alex Rybakov
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve %
69%
(
75 of
108)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
75)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
108)
98
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Pedro Sakamoto
55%
(
52 of
94)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
3
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
1
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
90
Total Points Won
79
|
6-7(8) 6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Daniil Glinka
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve %
78%
(
28 of
36)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Marvin Moeller
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
64%
(
45 of
70)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
81
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Dennis Novak
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
4
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Alessandro Pecci
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Sigsgaard
Player
Nino Serdarusic
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
10
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-7(3) 7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Cem Ilkel
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Henri Haupt
31%
(
4 of
13)
1st Serve %
73%
(
11 of
15)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
8%
(
1 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
10 of
15)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Cem Ilkel
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
77%
(
67 of
87)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
39 of
67)
75%
(
18 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Jordan Correia Passos Do Carmo
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Pepijn Bastiaansen
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Matyas Fuele
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
49%
(
23 of
47)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tuncay Duran
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
7
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Thando Longwe-Smit
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Sigsgaard vs Ilkel?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Sigsgaard Vs Ilkel is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (112/63) | Win/Loss | 57% (433/332) |
| 63% (250/146) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (967/801) |
| 56% (2057/1640) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (8675/8147) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 383 | Aces Total | 2802 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 248 | Total Double Faults | 1373 |
| 1:12:29 | Average Match Time | 1:14:27 |
| 214.53 | Average Opponent Rank | 204.64 |
| 66% (5666/8541) | 1st Serve % | 58% (23627/40473) |
| 67% (3809/5666) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16617/23627) |
| 53% (1517/2875) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8584/16846) |
| 48% (445/925) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1602/3959) |
| 43% (3739/8749) | Return Points Win % | 39% (15947/40945) |
| 64% (107/168) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (421/746) |
| 75% (3/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 55% (24/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (145/271) |
| 40% (17/43) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (128/229) |
| 87% (116/101) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (420/358) |
| 13% (116/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (420/60) |
| 19% (59/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (344/73) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Cem Ilkel
View full predicted draw for Ilkel
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
